ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
WATCH AFib: smartwatches for detection of atrial fibrillation in secondary prevention of cryptogenic stroke-protocol for a prospective, intraindividual-controlled, multicentre clinical study.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rationale: Detection of atrial fibrillation (AFib) and subsequent anticoagulation therapy reduce the risk of recurrent stroke, while prolonged rhythm monitoring significantly increases AFib detection. Thus, prolonged smartwatch-based ECG monitoring after cryptogenic ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) could lead to a reduction of recurrent stroke by prompting adequate anticoagulation therapy. Aim: WATCH AFib investigates the accuracy of smartwatches for AFib detection in patients with cryptogenic TIA or ischemic stroke compared to an implantable event recorder. Sample size: 40 cases of AFib are required to estimate the sensitivity for AFib detection per patient with a precision of about 10%. As AFib is observed in 9%-16% of cryptogenic strokes, we intend to enroll 400 patients. Methods: WATCH AFib is a prospective, intraindividual-controlled, multicentre clinical study in patients with cryptogenic ischemic stroke or TIA. ECG-data from smartwatches and event recorders is continuously monitored by two independent cardiologists for a follow-up period of 6 months. If AFib is detected, therapeutic options are discussed at the including center. Primary outcome: To compare smartwatch- and event recorder- based sensitivity and specificity of AFib detection per patient after 6 months. Discussion: Prolonged AFib screening after stroke is currently suboptimal. Smartwatches might be a non-invasive, cost-effective, widely available alternative for prolonged rhythm monitoring. Usability in severely affected patients and patients with persisting neurological deficits might be limited. Trial registration: The study is registered on clinicaltrials.gov. Registration number: 20230726.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.