Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41281557›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025

WATCH AFib: smartwatches for detection of atrial fibrillation in secondary prevention of cryptogenic stroke-protocol for a prospective, intraindividual-controlled, multicentre clinical study.

Horst Penkert, Johanna Härtl, Alexander Hapfelmeier, Silvia Egert-Schwender, Edith Heimsch, Sabine Friedenberg, Alexander Müller, Franziska Hahn, Eimo Martens, Silke Wunderlich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Horst PenkertDepartment of Neurology, TUM University Hospital, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Johanna HärtlDepartment of Neurology, TUM University Hospital, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Alexander HapfelmeierInstitute of AI and Informatics in Medicine, TUM University Hospital, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Silvia Egert-SchwenderMuenchner Studienzentrum (MSZ), School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Edith HeimschMuenchner Studienzentrum (MSZ), School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sabine FriedenbergMuenchner Studienzentrum (MSZ), School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Alexander MüllerDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Cardiology, TUM University Hospital, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Franziska HahnDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Cardiology, TUM University Hospital, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Eimo MartensDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Cardiology, TUM University Hospital, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Silke WunderlichDepartment of Neurology, TUM University Hospital, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rationale: Detection of atrial fibrillation (AFib) and subsequent anticoagulation therapy reduce the risk of recurrent stroke, while prolonged rhythm monitoring significantly increases AFib detection. Thus, prolonged smartwatch-based ECG monitoring after cryptogenic ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) could lead to a reduction of recurrent stroke by prompting adequate anticoagulation therapy. Aim: WATCH AFib investigates the accuracy of smartwatches for AFib detection in patients with cryptogenic TIA or ischemic stroke compared to an implantable event recorder. Sample size: 40 cases of AFib are required to estimate the sensitivity for AFib detection per patient with a precision of about 10%. As AFib is observed in 9%-16% of cryptogenic strokes, we intend to enroll 400 patients. Methods: WATCH AFib is a prospective, intraindividual-controlled, multicentre clinical study in patients with cryptogenic ischemic stroke or TIA. ECG-data from smartwatches and event recorders is continuously monitored by two independent cardiologists for a follow-up period of 6 months. If AFib is detected, therapeutic options are discussed at the including center. Primary outcome: To compare smartwatch- and event recorder- based sensitivity and specificity of AFib detection per patient after 6 months. Discussion: Prolonged AFib screening after stroke is currently suboptimal. Smartwatches might be a non-invasive, cost-effective, widely available alternative for prolonged rhythm monitoring. Usability in severely affected patients and patients with persisting neurological deficits might be limited. Trial registration: The study is registered on clinicaltrials.gov. Registration number: 20230726.

Indexed as

atrial fibrillationischemic strokerhythm monitoringsmartwatchtelemedicinetransient ischemic attack

Identifiers

PMID41281557
PMCPMC12631340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.