ReviewFrontiers in aging2025
Stroke-related sarcopenia: a scoping review of influencing factors and clinical outcomes.
Review in Frontiers in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association of Sarcopenia With Global, Motor, Cognitive, and Swallowing Function Prognosis in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Brain and behavior · 2026Pooled it
- Predictive value of changes in temporal muscle volume for 6-month functional outcome in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- The mediating role of activities of daily living in the association between nutritional risk and cognitive function among stroke survivors: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stroke-related sarcopenia has attracted increasing attention, and the prevalence is increasing. However, the influencing factors and clinical outcomes are still not well reported in the literature, and existing studies are heterogeneous in terms of study design, outcomes, and means of outcome assessment. We conducted this scoping review to map and summarize the evidence in the rapidly growing field of stroke-related sarcopenia, and guide future research directions. Purpose: To synthesize the influencing factors and clinical outcomes of stroke-related sarcopenia. Methods: The scoping review process followed the methodological framework of Arksey and O'Malley and was reported using the PRISMA-ScR guideline. Six English databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library) were searched from the inception to 13 August 2024, and updated on 5 October 2025. We included studies involving influencing factors and clinical outcomes (concept) of stroke-related sarcopenia (population) in any setting (context). Results: Twenty-six studies were identified, including six cross-sectional and twenty cohort studies. Forty influencing factors were extracted and integrated into five categories, including demographic, disease, stroke-related, behavioral, and biomarker factors. Stroke-related sarcopenia can cause impaired motor, swallowing, neurological, and psychological function and lead to increased recurrence, readmission, and mortality. Conclusion: Our scoping review shows that stroke-related sarcopenia depends on multiple factors and has widespread effects. Understanding these influencing factors and clinical outcomes can help health professionals to intervene and manage stroke-related sarcopenia. However, heterogeneity in the details of the included studies made it difficult to undertake quantitative summaries across studies, more high-quality, multicenter studies should be conducted in the future to provide consistent evidence to guide clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.