Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41281355›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in aging2025

Stroke-related sarcopenia: a scoping review of influencing factors and clinical outcomes.

Hongyan Yang, Ting Yang, Hui Wei

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hongyan YangDepartment of Nursing, The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Ting YangDepartment of Nursing, The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Hui WeiDepartment of Nursing, The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Stroke-related sarcopenia has attracted increasing attention, and the prevalence is increasing. However, the influencing factors and clinical outcomes are still not well reported in the literature, and existing studies are heterogeneous in terms of study design, outcomes, and means of outcome assessment. We conducted this scoping review to map and summarize the evidence in the rapidly growing field of stroke-related sarcopenia, and guide future research directions. Purpose: To synthesize the influencing factors and clinical outcomes of stroke-related sarcopenia. Methods: The scoping review process followed the methodological framework of Arksey and O'Malley and was reported using the PRISMA-ScR guideline. Six English databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library) were searched from the inception to 13 August 2024, and updated on 5 October 2025. We included studies involving influencing factors and clinical outcomes (concept) of stroke-related sarcopenia (population) in any setting (context). Results: Twenty-six studies were identified, including six cross-sectional and twenty cohort studies. Forty influencing factors were extracted and integrated into five categories, including demographic, disease, stroke-related, behavioral, and biomarker factors. Stroke-related sarcopenia can cause impaired motor, swallowing, neurological, and psychological function and lead to increased recurrence, readmission, and mortality. Conclusion: Our scoping review shows that stroke-related sarcopenia depends on multiple factors and has widespread effects. Understanding these influencing factors and clinical outcomes can help health professionals to intervene and manage stroke-related sarcopenia. However, heterogeneity in the details of the included studies made it difficult to undertake quantitative summaries across studies, more high-quality, multicenter studies should be conducted in the future to provide consistent evidence to guide clinical practice.

Indexed as

influencing factorsoutcomessarcopeniascoping reviewstroke

Identifiers

PMID41281355
PMCPMC12630109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.