Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41281335›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Differential response pathways of

Jiangkai Xie, Jiayi Deng, Tairui Liu, Jinping Guo, Yunxiang Zhang, Meng Yang

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiangkai XieGuangxi Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Conservation, College of Forestry, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Jiayi DengGuangxi Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Conservation, College of Forestry, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Tairui LiuGuangxi Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Conservation, College of Forestry, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Jinping GuoCollege of Forestry, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong, China.
Yunxiang ZhangCollege of Forestry, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong, China.
Meng YangGuangxi Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Conservation, College of Forestry, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In mountain ecosystems, the native altitude acclimation and transplantation altitude response strategies of plant seedlings may provide theoretical guidance and strong evidence for addressing the continuous reduction of species' suitable habitats caused by global changes. However, our understanding of the adaptation to native altitude, altitude gradient responses, and underlying mechanisms of native mountain tree species in North China is still unclear. We designed a field experiment in mountainous areas where seedlings from different provenance altitudes (low altitude: 1600 m; high altitude: 2400 m) were transplanted to four typical altitudes. By measuring 18 functional trait indicators related to physiology, leaf characteristics, and nutrients, we attempted to reveal the adaptation of

Indexed as

elevationmorphological traitsnutrient traitsPicea asperata seedlingseedling physiological functiontransplantation

Identifiers

PMID41281335
PMCPMC12637028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.