ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
An optimized transfer learning approach integrating deep convolutional feature extractors for malaria parasite classification in erythrocyte microscopy.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning-assisted malaria microscopy with sensitivity-aware threshold optimization.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Implementation of artificial intelligence in the 2025 medical parasitology course at Hallym University.Journal of educational evaluation for health professions · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Malaria, caused by Methods: This paper evaluates the efficacy of an ensemble learning approach for automated malaria diagnosis. The proposed model integrates convolutional ensemble methods, combining outputs from transfer learning architectures such as VGG16, ResNet50V2, DenseNet201, and VGG19. Data augmentation and pre-processing techniques were applied to enhance robustness, and the ensemble approach was fine-tuned for optimal hyperparameters. Results: The ensemble achieves a test accuracy of 97.93% by combining a evidence of CNN with multiple transfer learning models (VGG16, ResNet50V2, DenseNet201, and VGG19), with an F1-score and precision of 0.9793 each, outperforming standalone models like Custom CNN (accuracy: 97.20%, F1-score: 0.9720), VGG16 (accuracy: 97.65%, F1-score: 0.9765), and CNN-SVM (accuracy: 82.47%, F1-score: 0.8266). The method demonstrated effectiveness in classifying parasitized and uninfected blood smears with high reliability, addressing the limitations of manual microscopy and standalone models. Conclusion: The proposed ensemble learning approach highlights the potential of integrating transfer learning models to improve diagnostic accuracy for malaria detection. This scalable, automated solution reduces reliance on manual microscopy, making it highly applicable in resource-constrained settings and offering a significant advancement in malaria diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.