ArticleJournal of medical biochemistry2025
Plasma alterations in immunoglobulin G, immunoglobulin M, immunoglobulin A, serum transferrin, serum albumin, prealbumin, interleukin 6 and serum C-reactive protein after immune-type enteral nutrition support in patients undergoing radical resection of colon cancer.
Article in Journal of medical biochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aims to evaluate the effects of high-quality nursing combined with immune-type enteral nutrition (IEN) support on postoperative recovery, nutritional status, immune function, inflammatory response, and complication rates in patients undergoing radical colon cancer resection. Methods: A total of 106 patients with colon cancer who underwent radical resection were randomly divided into a control group (CG) and an observation group (OG). The CG received routine nursing care and parenteral nutrition support, while the OG received high-quality nursing care and immune-type enteral nutrition support. Key outcomes were assessed, including recovery times, nutritional markers, immune function, inflammatory response, quality of life (QLQ-C30 scores), complication incidence, and nursing satisfaction. Results: The OG demonstrated significantly shorter recovery times for bowel sounds, exhaust gas, defecation, time to get out of bed, and overall hospital stay compared to the CG (P<0.05). The incidence of complications was also lower in the OG (3.77% vs. 16.98%, P=0.025). Nutritional markers such as serum transferrin (TFN), prealbumin (PA), and albumin (ALB) were significantly higher in the OG (P<0.05), along with increased levels of immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, and IgM) and reduced inflammatory markers (CRP and IL-6, P<0.05). Quality of life scores and nursing satisfaction were significantly better in the OG (P<0.05). Conclusions: High-quality nursing combined with immune-type enteral nutrition support significantly enhances postoperative recovery, improves nutritional and immune status, reduces inflammation, lowers complication rates, and boosts the quality of life and nursing satisfaction in patients undergoing radical resection for colon cancer. This approach provides an effective strategy for promoting better outcomes in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.