Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41281245›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2025

Using large language models for temporal relation extraction from pediatric clinical reports.

Judith Jeyafreeda Andrew, Juliette Potier, Nicolas Garcelon, Anita Burgun, Marc Vincent

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Judith Jeyafreeda AndrewClinical Bioinformatics Laboratory, INSERM UMR1163, Imagine Institute, Université Paris Cité, Paris, F-75006, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2305-1439
Juliette PotierClinical Bioinformatics Laboratory, INSERM UMR1163, Imagine Institute, Université Paris Cité, Paris, F-75006, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5160-7927
Nicolas GarcelonClinical Bioinformatics Laboratory, INSERM UMR1163, Imagine Institute, Université Paris Cité, Paris, F-75006, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3326-2811
Anita BurgunClinical Bioinformatics Laboratory, INSERM UMR1163, Imagine Institute, Université Paris Cité, Paris, F-75006, France.
Marc VincentClinical Bioinformatics Laboratory, INSERM UMR1163, Imagine Institute, Université Paris Cité, Paris, F-75006, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate large language models (LLMs) for extracting temporal relations from pediatric rare disease clinical reports to enable automated patient timeline creation. Materials and Methods: We developed a temporal relation extraction framework for electronic health records, using 25 clinical reports from a pediatric rare disease hospital. We implemented few-shot prompting with 3 different LLMs in secure environments. Results: Our findings reveal that binary classification significantly outperforms multi-class approaches for temporal relation extraction, with best F1 scores reaching 0.70 for simpler relations while more complex relations remain challenging (F1: 0.03-0.40). Mistral 22B emerged as the strongest overall performer, though model superiority varied by relation type. Discussion: The dramatic performance improvement from reducing cognitive load (binary vs multi-class classification) demonstrates that task formulation critically impacts LLM effectiveness in specialized clinical domains. Our few-shot approach successfully enables temporal relation extraction from French pediatric texts while maintaining data privacy through local deployment, offering a viable methodology for healthcare institutions with strict data governance requirements. Conclusion: Our few-shot prompting approach demonstrated promising results in secure environments. This methodology allows technique sharing without exposing sensitive data, advancing research possibilities for clinical natural language processing in restricted settings.

Indexed as

large language modelpatient timelinerare diseasestemporal relation extraction

Identifiers

PMID41281245
PMCPMC12640238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.