ArticleJAMIA open2025
Using large language models for temporal relation extraction from pediatric clinical reports.
Article in JAMIA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging Generative Large Language Models for Temporal Relation Extraction From French Clinical Narratives: Prompt-Chaining Approach.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- From annotation to adaptation: extracting temporal relations in French clinical narratives.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
- Detecting temporal clinical change in sequential chest radiography reports: a multi-model and multi-prompt evaluation of large language models.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Clinical temporal relation extraction with long-context transformers: a robustness study on MIMIC-III and MIMIC-IV.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate large language models (LLMs) for extracting temporal relations from pediatric rare disease clinical reports to enable automated patient timeline creation. Materials and Methods: We developed a temporal relation extraction framework for electronic health records, using 25 clinical reports from a pediatric rare disease hospital. We implemented few-shot prompting with 3 different LLMs in secure environments. Results: Our findings reveal that binary classification significantly outperforms multi-class approaches for temporal relation extraction, with best F1 scores reaching 0.70 for simpler relations while more complex relations remain challenging (F1: 0.03-0.40). Mistral 22B emerged as the strongest overall performer, though model superiority varied by relation type. Discussion: The dramatic performance improvement from reducing cognitive load (binary vs multi-class classification) demonstrates that task formulation critically impacts LLM effectiveness in specialized clinical domains. Our few-shot approach successfully enables temporal relation extraction from French pediatric texts while maintaining data privacy through local deployment, offering a viable methodology for healthcare institutions with strict data governance requirements. Conclusion: Our few-shot prompting approach demonstrated promising results in secure environments. This methodology allows technique sharing without exposing sensitive data, advancing research possibilities for clinical natural language processing in restricted settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.