ArticleArXiv2025
AI in Proton Therapy Treatment Planning: A Review.
Article in ArXiv, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Proton therapy provides superior dose conformity compared to photon therapy, but its treatment planning is challenged by sensitivity to anatomical changes, setup/range uncertainties, and computational complexity. This review evaluates the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in improving proton therapy treatment planning. Materials and methods: Recent studies on AI applications in image reconstruction, image registration, dose calculation, plan optimization, and quality assessment were reviewed and summarized by application domain and validation strategy. Results: AI has shown promise in automating contouring, enhancing imaging for dose calculation, predicting dose distributions, and accelerating robust optimization. These methods reduce manual workload, improve efficiency, and support more personalized planning and adaptive planning. Limitations include data scarcity, model generalizability, and clinical integration. Conclusion: AI is emerging as a key enabler of efficient, consistent, and patient-specific proton therapy treatment planning. Addressing challenges in validation and implementation will be essential for its translation into routine clinical practice.
Identifiers
41281232PMC12633628What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.