Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41281179›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India

Impact of Collimator Material on Spatial Resolution and Sensitivity in Semiconductor-Based Imaging Systems: A Monte Carlo Evaluation.

M A Ghoneim, Wafaa Rashed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M A GhoneimDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Science, New Valley University, El-Kharja, Egypt.
Wafaa RashedDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Science, New Valley University, El-Kharja, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In gamma cameras, there is significant interest in developing novel devices that employ a semiconductor detector. The most significant quality control parameter for assessing the performance of gamma cameras with parallel-hole collimating is the spatial resolution. Acceptable spatial resolution is due to the high absorption and stopping power of collimator materials, while they may lead to a reduction in sensitivity in the same condition. Thus, a comparison between sensitivity and spatial resolution is crucial in nuclear medicine imaging devices. Aims and Objectives: This work aimed to compare spatial resolutions using pixellated parallel-hole collimators with lead and tungsten at equal sensitivity to assess the camera's performance. Materials and Methods: The overall imaging system was simulated using a Geant4 Application for Tomographic Emission simulation tool. Furthermore, source-to-detector distance effects on image performance and spatial resolution were evaluated using a simulated hot-rod phantom. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) and the full width at tenth maximum (FWTM) stand for the spatial resolution. Results: The averages of measured FWHM using lead at equivalent sensitivities were 3.28% greater than that of tungsten. Furthermore, the averages of measured FWTM of lead at equivalent sensitivities were 7.99% greater than those obtained with tungsten. Conclusion: The results demonstrated that at a specific sensitivity, lead provides better spatial resolution than tungsten.

Indexed as

Gamma cameraMonte Carlo simulationparallel-hole collimatorsensitivityspatial resolution

Identifiers

PMID41281179
PMCPMC12633812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.