Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41281117›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Rare Indications of Splenectomy: A Case Series and Literature Review.

Nivash Maran, Sugumar Chidambaranathan, Krishna Moorthy

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nivash MaranSurgical Gastroenterology, Madras Medical College, Chennai, IND.
Sugumar ChidambaranathanSurgical Gastroenterology, Madras Medical College, Chennai, IND.
Krishna MoorthySurgical Gastroenterology, Madras Medical College, Chennai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Splenectomy is a procedure, most commonly performed for trauma, hematological disorders, and certain malignancies. Rare indications such as congenital bleeding disorders, pancreatitis complications, and splenic cysts may also warrant splenic removal, especially in life-threatening conditions or diagnostically unclear scenarios. In this retrospective descriptive case series, we report cases of six patients who underwent splenectomy for rare indications. The first case involves a 13-year-old boy with congenital afibrinogenemia who presented with signs of acute abdomen and class 3 hypovolemic shock. Computed tomography (CT) imaging of the abdomen and pelvis revealed a large perisplenic hematoma and hemoperitoneum suggestive of spontaneous hemorrhage. Despite fibrinogen replacement therapy, the patient remained hemodynamically unstable, and emergency open splenectomy was performed, which proved to be life-saving. The second and third cases involved middle-aged men with chronic alcoholic pancreatitis who developed large intrasplenic pseudocysts with spontaneous rupture, evidenced by contrast extravasation on CT. Both underwent emergency splenectomy with distal pancreatectomy. Histopathology revealed pseudocysts with no evidence of malignancy. These cases confirm how the anatomical proximity between the pancreatic tail and spleen can facilitate enzymatic injury leading to splenic rupture, an infrequent but dangerous complication of chronic pancreatitis. The remaining two cases were two young female patients who presented with large splenic cysts, and one of them had undergone prior percutaneous catheter drainage and developed infection. Both underwent elective splenectomy due to persistent symptoms and diagnostic uncertainty. Histopathology revealed a benign epithelial cyst in one and a splenic abscess in the other, illustrating the importance of definitive surgical management in selected cystic lesions of the spleen. The final and most aggressive case involved a 44-year-old woman who presented in hemorrhagic shock. Imaging revealed a ruptured splenic mass with multiple lesions in the liver. Emergency splenectomy was performed, and histopathology confirmed primary angiosarcoma of the spleen. Despite surgical intervention, the patient succumbed postoperatively, underscoring the dismal prognosis associated with this rare vascular malignancy. Each case highlights the diagnostic and therapeutic role of splenectomy in atypical scenarios. Awareness of such rare indications can aid timely surgical decision-making when imaging or conservative strategies are inconclusive or ineffective. Though uncommon, conditions such as congenital bleeding disorders, pancreatitis-related complications, and primary benign splenic cyst must be considered in the differential diagnosis of splenic pathology. Splenectomy remains a definitive solution in selected cases.

Indexed as

afibrinogenemiaangiosarcoma spleenatraumatic splenic rupturepancreatitisrare indicationsruptured splenic abscesssplenectomysplenic cyst

Identifiers

PMID41281117
PMCPMC12635429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.