ArticleCureus2025
Rare Ganglion Cyst of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ganglion cysts are common benign lesions arising from joint capsules or tendon sheaths, but their occurrence in the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint is extremely rare. Preoperative diagnosis of subcutaneous tumors in this region can be difficult, as imaging findings are often nonspecific and biopsy may be avoided due to the risk of nerve or vessel injury. We report the case of a woman in her 70s who presented with a slowly enlarging subcutaneous mass on the medial aspect of the right first MTP joint. MRI and ultrasound suggested a cystic lesion but failed to confirm continuity with the joint capsule. During surgery, jelly-like contents were identified, confirming the diagnosis of a ganglion cyst. Complete excision including the stalk was performed, and no recurrence has been observed after six months of follow-up. This case demonstrates that intraoperative findings can be crucial for establishing a diagnosis and ensuring complete excision when preoperative evaluation is inconclusive. Dermatologists performing minor surgery should recognize the importance of intraoperative assessment when managing diagnostically challenging subcutaneous tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.