Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41281089›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Intravenous Albumin for Oedema in Children With Nephrotic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Mapping of the Evidence Landscape.

Sohaib B Nawaz, Muhammad Ashfaq Zafar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sohaib B NawazPaediatrics and Child Health, School of Paediatrics, Yorkshire and Humber, GBR.
Muhammad Ashfaq ZafarPaediatric Medicine, Mayo University Hospital, Castlebar, IRL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nephrotic syndrome is a common glomerular disorder in childhood, often complicated by oedema, which contributes to morbidity, discomfort and prolonged hospitalisation. Intravenous (IV) albumin is frequently used with diuretics in children with resistant oedema, but its effectiveness and safety remain uncertain. Previous reviews are limited by adult populations, small sample sizes or a lack of quantitative synthesis. Our aim was to systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of IV albumin, with or without diuretics, versus no albumin in hospitalised children with nephrotic syndrome and oedema, and to map excluded-but-relevant studies to identify evidence gaps. We searched PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Google Scholar and Europe PMC from January 1, 1990, to June 30, 2025, using MeSH terms and free-text keywords for nephrotic syndrome, albumin and paediatric populations. Reference lists of eligible studies and prior reviews were hand-searched. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs and comparative observational studies in children aged 1-18 years hospitalised with nephrotic syndrome and oedema. Studies without a comparator, non-paediatric populations, non-English publications or single-arm case series were excluded. Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool (ROB 2) for RCTs. Due to the paucity of eligible studies and heterogeneity, outcomes were narratively synthesised. Excluded-but-relevant studies were mapped to identify evidence gaps. Out of 784 screened records, only one RCT met the inclusion criteria. Albumin plus furosemide significantly increased short-term urine output and weight reduction compared to furosemide alone, but effects were transient, and patient-centred outcomes were largely unassessed. Evidence mapping revealed multiple excluded studies with methodological limitations, inappropriate comparators or adult/mixed populations. Previous reviews corroborated the transient physiological effects but lacked paediatric-specific conclusions. We concluded that evidence supporting IV albumin use in hospitalised children with nephrotic syndrome is extremely limited. Albumin may provide short-term physiological benefit in select cases, but routine use is not justified. High-quality, adequately powered paediatric RCTs with standardised outcomes and systematic safety reporting are urgently needed to guide clinical practice.

Indexed as

albumin (alb)childhood nephrotic syndromenephrology disordersnephroticpaediatric diseaseswelling (oedema)systematic mappingsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41281089
PMCPMC12636047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.