ArticleCureus2025
Neuraxial Anesthesia in Parturients With Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A cerebral arteriovenous malformation (AVM) is an abnormal nidus of blood vessels that directly connects the arteries and veins in the brain, bypassing the normal capillary network. Due to the rarity of this condition, specific anesthetic management guidelines for patients with intracranial AVMs are limited. In patients with cerebral AVMs, increased intracranial pressure is a concern in the setting of recent hemorrhage, significant mass effect, or venous congestion. In these types of cases, anesthetic management becomes more complex. The risk of AVM rupture during pregnancy, though rare, is a potentially fatal complication and may be considered a relative contraindication to neuraxial anesthesia. We present two cases of pregnant patients with prior diagnosis of AVM who successfully underwent cesarean section using neuraxial anesthesia without any intraoperative or postoperative complications. Neuraxial anesthesia was selected over general anesthesia to minimize hemodynamic fluctuations, reduce intracranial pressure risk, and allow continuous neurological monitoring. These cases add to the limited body of evidence suggesting that neuraxial anesthesia can be a viable option for such patients, provided that comprehensive multidisciplinary care is implemented throughout the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.