Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41281043›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Safety and Effectiveness of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (Avelle) on Venous Leg Ulcers: The SPACE Study.

Jorge Ulloa, Valentin Figueroa, Antonio Solano, Gwen Lawrence

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05666570 (A Study to Demonstrate the Safety and Performance of the Avelle® Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System on Chronic Wounds), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05666570 withdrawnnot on this map

A Study to Demonstrate the Safety and Performance of the Avelle® Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System on Chronic Wounds

TypeobservationalSponsorConvaTec Inc.Ran2022 to 2023Enrolled0ConditionsDiabetic Foot Ulcer, Venous Leg UlcerArmsAvelle NPWT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jorge UlloaVascular Surgery, Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota, Bogota, COL.
Valentin FigueroaVascular Surgery, Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota, Bogota, COL.
Antonio SolanoVascular Surgery, Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota, Bogota, COL.
Gwen LawrenceAdvanced Wound Care, Convatec, Deeside, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Hard-to-heal wounds represent a substantial burden on patients' quality of life and healthcare systems. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is an advanced therapy used to manage hard-to-heal wounds as an adjunct to standard wound care; however, there are limited data on its clinical effectiveness. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of the Avelle NPWT system in hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers (VLUs). Methods This was a single-arm, single-center, open-label, prospective study (NCT05666570) conducted in a Colombian outpatient setting. Patients with a venous ulcer, as per Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, and Pathophysiological (CEAP) Classification C6/C6R, that has not progressed by >30% in the previous 4 weeks were enrolled. Eligible patients received NPWT at the screening/baseline visit (Visit 1) with scheduled follow-up visits on Day 6 ± 1 (Visit 2) and Day 13 ± 1 (Visit 3; end of study). The primary endpoints were baseline change in wound size and dressing durability. Secondary endpoints included clinical wound characteristics and device-related adverse events. Results Fifty-nine patients (median age: 66 years) with VLUs were enrolled (intention-to-treat population). In the per protocol population (n=50), the mean ± standard deviation wound area was 13.4 ± 17.0 cm

Indexed as

medical devicenegative pressure wound therapytreatment outcomevaricose ulcervenous leg ulcer

Identifiers

PMID41281043
PMCPMC12631151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.