ArticleCureus2025
Influence of Social Media on Physician Selection and Medical Advice-Seeking Behaviors: A Cross-Sectional Study in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Social media (SM) can help the public cultivate their autonomy by enriching the information offered by healthcare professionals (HCPs). It enables patients to obtain advice and complement offline information, perhaps increasing patient empowerment. The study aims to assess the influence of SM on the behavior of the general population when seeking healthcare advice and care from HCPs in Saudi Arabia. Materials and methods This was a cross-sectional study conducted in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, using a face-validated questionnaire by two experts and one statistician to receive participants' perceptions, attitudes, and experiences regarding SM in seeking medical care. Appropriate tests of significance and data presentation methods were used to explain the findings scientifically. Results Analysis of participant responses revealed that SM played a significant role in healthcare decision-making: its influence was rated as strong by 26% of participants and moderate by 47.8%. Snapchat, Telegram, and Instagram were the most commonly used platforms to access medical information from HCPs and medical institutions. Participants who belonged to the age groups of 35-44 and 45-54 years and those who were employed significantly showed a stronger influence than others (p<0.001). There was a statistically significant positive association observed between hours spent on SM and influence (p<0.05). Conclusion The impact of SM in seeking healthcare advice and care was found to be moderate among the participants. HCPs can establish interactive patient strategies using SM platforms. Physicians may reach out to potential patients and offer information about their healthcare organization or private practice using various SM platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.