ArticleCureus2025
An Unusual Case of Bladder Wall Erosion Due to Prolonged Use of a Coudé Tip Urethral Catheter in a 79-Year-Old Man.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present the case of a 79-year-old man with long-term lower urinary tract obstruction managed with a coudé tip urethral catheter, who had an incidental finding of posterior bladder wall erosion diagnosed at cystoscopy for prostate enucleation. The posterior bladder wall erosion was treated conservatively. This rare but serious complication highlights the potential risk of prolonged use of rigid, curved-tip catheters and the need for careful catheter selection and regular reassessment in patients requiring long-term indwelling urinary drainage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.