Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41280995›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Vulval Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A 15-Year Review of Treatment Outcomes in a UK Centre.

Mark A McGowan, Krishnayan Haldar, Pubudu Pathiraja, Jane Sterling, Peter Baldwin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mark A McGowanObstetrics and Gynaecology, C W Wiebe Medical Centre, Winkler, CAN.
Krishnayan HaldarGynaecological Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, GBR.
Pubudu PathirajaGynaecological Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, GBR.
Jane SterlingDermatology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, GBR.
Peter BaldwinGynaecological Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) is a premalignant condition with a high risk of recurrence. Understanding recurrence patterns may help guide treatment planning and follow-up, particularly when comparing unifocal and multifocal disease. Methods We conducted a 15-year retrospective cohort study of patients treated for VIN at Cambridge University Hospitals, a tertiary referral center in Cambridge, England, from 2008 to 2022. Patients received local excision (clear or positive margins), CO₂ laser ablation, or medical therapy (imiquimod/cidofovir) and were stratified into unifocal or multifocal subgroups. Demographic and clinical characteristics were analyzed, with recurrence rates and time to recurrence compared across groups. Results A total of 108 patients were included: 26 treated with local excision with clear margins, 44 with excision with positive margins, 25 with laser, and 13 with medical therapy. The median age was 51 years (95% CI 50-55). In unifocal disease, time to recurrence differed significantly by treatment modality (p = 0.04), with the longest median interval in patients with clear-margin excision. In multifocal disease, recurrence risk remained high across all treatment groups without significant differences in time to recurrence (p = 0.21). Conclusions Unifocal VIN treated with excision and negative margins was associated with the lowest recurrence risk, supporting the possibility of reduced follow-up intensity in selected cases. By contrast, positive margins and multifocal disease were linked with earlier and more frequent recurrence, underscoring the importance of close, long-term surveillance. These findings may inform follow-up strategies, although further research is needed.

Indexed as

immunomodulatorprecancerous conditionsurgical skin excisionvulval lesionvulvar intraepithelial neoplasia

Identifiers

PMID41280995
PMCPMC12633784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.