Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41280977›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Breast Cancer Data Analysis Using Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms.

Durga H Kutal, Beyza N Koseoglu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Durga H KutalMathematics, Augusta University, Augusta, USA.
Beyza N KoseogluMathematics, Augusta University, Augusta, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is one of the most serious diseases and a leading cause of cancer-related deaths for women worldwide. This study evaluates and compares the performance of several supervised machine learning algorithms for breast cancer tumor classification, using a real-world dataset (sourced from Kaggle.com). From an initial 212 observations, the final dataset was reduced to 205 after handling missing values. We employed logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, and support vector machines (SVMs) with various kernels, focusing on model accuracy, feature importance, and the impact of dimensionality reduction. All models demonstrated strong performance, with accuracies above 87%. The most effective classifiers were the random forest and polynomial SVM, achieving the highest area under the curve (AUC) values of 96.3% and 96.9%, respectively. Feature importance analysis consistently identified Tumor Size, Involved Lymph Nodes, Metastasis, and Age as the most significant predictors. The high accuracy of simpler models, such as logistic regression and a linear SVM, is attributed to the dataset's inherent linear separability. Our findings also validate the use of principal component analysis (PCA) for feature reduction, as key models maintained high performance on the simplified dataset.

Indexed as

breast cancer datasetdecision treelogistic regressionmachine learningrandom forestssupport vector machines

Identifiers

PMID41280977
PMCPMC12635515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.