ArticleCureus2025
Early Exposure to Step 1-Style Questions in the Preclinical Curriculum: A Student-Led Initiative to Support Clinical Reasoning and United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Preparation.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- First-year medical students' use of practice questions to understand science courses.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preclinical medical students often face challenges transitioning to United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1-style board questions due to differences in content emphasis and question format compared to traditional coursework. Through a student-led initiative, weekly AMBOSS question sets with explanatory videos were created to align with the University of Arizona College of Medicine - Tucson's (UACOM-T) curriculum, with the goal of familiarizing first-year students with board-style questions early in their training. To assess the perceived usefulness and impact of this resource, a survey was distributed to preclinical students, which gathered feedback on engagement, perceived benefits, and suggestions for improvement after six months of use. Survey responses were collected from 93 first-year medical students (77% of the class of 2028, referring to students who began in 2024 and are expected to graduate in 2028), with 90.3% (95% CI: 82.6%-94.8%) of respondents using at least some of the weekly question sets. About 92.3% (95% CI: 85.3%-96.3%) of respondents felt more prepared for board-style questions because of these sets. And 73.2% (95% CI: 63.3%-81.1%) of respondents also stated that the sets increased their confidence in answering board-style questions. About 82.8% (95% CI: 73.9%-89.1%) also felt it enhanced their understanding of the preclinical curriculum. These initial results indicate that most first-year students engaged with the question sets and gained confidence in applying their preclinical knowledge to Step 1-style questions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.