ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2025
Safety and Efficacy of Sequential Chemoimmunotherapy Followed by Concurrent Chemoradiation in Unresectable Stage III NSCLC.
Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficacy comparison of first-line treatment regimens for stage IV esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with supraclavicular lymph node metastasis: A study of the oligometastatic subtype.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The eighth edition of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer staging project reports a 5-year overall survival (OS) for stage IIIA, B, and C NSCLC of 41%, 24%, and 12%, respectively, highlighting the need for improved treatment options. Induction chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibition (ID-chemo-ICI) followed by concurrent chemoradiation (cCRT) has not been adequately studied because of concerns about toxicity. We aim to describe the outcomes of patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC who received ID-chemo-ICI followed by cCRT with or without maintenance ICI. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC who received ID-chemo-ICI with the intent to proceed with cCRT across all Mayo Clinic sites. Clinical end points included progression-free survival (PFS), OS, overall response rate per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, and treatment-related adverse events defined using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Results: A total of 29 patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC, deemed unsuitable for upfront cCRT or surgery, with a plan to proceed with ID-chemo-ICI before cCRT, were identified. The median age was 66 years, 55% were male, most had a history of smoking (93.1%), and 100% identified as White. Tumor histologies were adenocarcinoma (69%), squamous cell carcinoma (24%), poorly differentiated NSCLC (3.4%), and sarcomatoid NSCLC (3.4%). Most were stage IIIB (44.8%), followed by IIIC (41.4%), and IIIA (13.8%). N2 and N3 disease were present in 37.9% and 55.2%, respectively. Programmed death-ligand 1 expression included less than 1% (n = 11, 38%), 1% to 49% (n = 9, 31%), greater than 50% (n = 5, 17%), and unknown (n = 4, 14%). Patients received ID-chemo-ICI with pembrolizumab (82.8%), nivolumab (13.8%), or atezolizumab (3.4%), with a median of four cycles. The overall response rate to ID-chemo-ICI was 93%. Of the cohort, 90% received cCRT, and 76% received maintenance ICI (pembrolizumab or durvalumab). The median PFS was 18 months, and the median OS was 24 months. Pneumonitis occurred in 37.9% (grade 1: 18.2%; grade 2: 63.6%; grade 3: 18%, no grade 4). Esophagitis occurred in 55.2% (grade 1-2: 93%; grade 3: 7%). Conclusions: ID-chemo-ICI followed by cCRT seems feasible and safe for unresectable stage III NSCLC, particularly for patients unsuitable for upfront cCRT. Larger prospective trials are needed to validate these findings and optimize patient selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.