ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Prognostic value of the MDACC-NLR score in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer treated with first-line chemoimmunotherapy.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the prognostic performance of six scoring systems in predicting outcomes of first-line chemo-immunotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), aiming to guide individualized treatment. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 197 ES-SCLC patients treated with first-line chemo-immunotherapy. Clinical and laboratory data were collected, including baseline characteristics, treatment responses, and survival outcomes. The prognostic impact of six scoring systems (RHM, MDACC, MDACC+NLR, MDA-ICI, LIPI, GRIm) was assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted for risk stratification. Results: By the last follow-up (October 15, 2024), the median follow-up was 12 months, with 113 deaths (57.3%). The objective response rate was 75.6%. ECOG ≥1, lung metastasis, and liver metastasis were independent predictors of poorer PFS and OS. Among the scoring systems, only MDACC+NLR effectively stratified patients: low-risk patients had significantly longer PFS and OS (both p = 0.02). MDACC alone did not distinguish PFS among risk groups (p = 0.17) but showed significant OS differences (p = 0.02). Other systems (RHM, MDA-ICI, LIPI, GRIm) lacked significant discriminatory ability for both PFS and OS (all p > 0.05). Conclusion: ECOG ≥1, lung metastasis, and liver metastasis are adverse prognostic factors for ES-SCLC patients receiving first-line chemo-immunotherapy. The MDACC+NLR scoring system provides superior predictive value for treatment outcomes and survival, supporting its potential utility for clinical risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.