Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41280845›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

Undergraduate Research at Primarily Undergraduate Institutions: Current State and Dilemmas.

Maira Faisal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Maira FaisalDepartment of Biological Sciences and Department of English, Northern Kentucky University, Highland Heights, Kentucky 41076, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0063-623X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growth of undergraduate research (UGR) in popularity and depth in the past 25 years is greatly owed to primarily undergraduate institutions (PUIs). Studies have shown that laboratories at academic institutions are broadly either student- or research-focused: the former is more common in PUIs, and the latter in research-intensive institutions. However, the student-oriented approach is more beneficial to the studentand, in the long run, the scientific community. The student-centered approach combats the unsustainable shift in scientific academia toward productivity over progress, an intensifying issue in research. The shift encourages researchers to resort to tools like artificial intelligence instead of working thoroughly and incrementally toward new knowledge. With young researchers inheriting this mindset, we worsen our understanding of the knowledge we have and that which we could learn. As an undergraduate student majoring in both STEM and the humanities as well as participating in biochemistry UGR at a PUI, I believe part of these problems arises from a lack of information literacy (IL). The foundational concepts of IL teach the iterative process of research and instill a respect for the creation of information. These ideas reflect the supportive culture of PUIs that initially allowed students (and, in turn, their institutions) to flourish within research.

Identifiers

PMID41280845
PMCPMC12631653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.