Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41280827›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

Keith Bratley, Ezra E Cable, William Weaver, Victoria V Volkis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Keith BratleyDepartment of Natural Sciences, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, 11868 College Backbone Rd., Princess Anne, Maryland 21853, United States.
Ezra E CableDepartment of Natural Sciences, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, 11868 College Backbone Rd., Princess Anne, Maryland 21853, United States.
William WeaverDepartment of Natural Sciences, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, 11868 College Backbone Rd., Princess Anne, Maryland 21853, United States.
Victoria V VolkisDepartment of Natural Sciences, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, 11868 College Backbone Rd., Princess Anne, Maryland 21853, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8415-0134

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the 15th century, scientists have been working to address biofouling, the accumulation of biofilm on submerged surfaces, like ships and buoys. Key stages in this process include bacterial precipitation and radical polymerization of bacteria's metabolites. Along with corrosion and extended fuel consumption by ships, biofilm also contributes to ecological changes by spreading invasive bacterial species across the world when segments of biofilm are detached from moving ships. Historically, effective antifouling solutions have been toxic to marine ecosystems and are now banned in many regions, including the US. While recently developed highly hydrophobic polymers have promise, they are currently expensive and challenging for technology transfer.As an alternative solution, nontoxic formulations have been studied for antifouling coatings that utilize organic renewable superfruits, medicinal herbs, and nonbiofilm-forming algae rich in antioxidants and/or essential oils and terpenes, combined with biocompatible polymers.

Identifiers

PMID41280827
PMCPMC12631701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.