ArticleiScience2025
Unraveling variability in young children's brain responses to varied sensory stimulations.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early childhood is a sensitive period of development, marked by high between and within individual variability in the acquisition of cognitive and social abilities. Our aim was to characterize electrophysiological individual sensory profiles of young children with electroencephalography. We recorded visual, auditory, and somesthetic event-related potentials (ERPs) to low-level, complex, and social sensory stimulations in 23 children (13 girls) without neurodevelopmental disorders (mean age: 47.8 months (±10.5) [30 64]). For each participant and condition, we analyzed ERPs' peak amplitudes and latencies and inter-trial consistency (ITC) as a measure of intra-individual variability. A hierarchical cluster analysis, following a principal-component analysis including all ERP measures, revealed 3 clusters; cluster separation was explained by mean ITC level. Neither age nor sensory-cognitive profiles explained cluster membership. Neurophysiological sensory profiles of young children differ mainly according to visual and auditory processing of complex information and do not rely solely on chronological age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.