ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2025
Refractive error and angle of deviation in basic esotropia versus exotropia: a comparative study.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo compare refractive error and angle of deviation in patients with basic esotropia and basic exotropia.
methodsA retrospective review was conducted on the medical records of patients with basic-type strabismus. Demographic data, refractive error, best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA), and the horizontal and vertical angle of deviation between basic esotropia and exotropia patients were compared.
resultsAmong the 7129 patients (mean age 22.98±14.81y) evaluated, 44.7% (3185 cases, 54.9% male) exhibited basic-type esotropia, while 55.3% (3944 cases, 53.9% male) presented with basic-type exotropia. Basic esotropia cases exhibited more hyperopic spherical equivalent measurements in both eyes (right: 0.53±3.07
conclusionBasic esotropia patients present more hyperopic refractive errors, better visual acuity, larger horizontal yet smaller vertical ocular misalignments, and tend to undergo strabismus surgery at younger ages relative to basic exotropia cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.