ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2025
An improved neighbourhood-based contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization method for contrast enhancement on retinal images.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo find the effective contrast enhancement method on retinal images for effective segmentation of retinal features.
methodsA novel image preprocessing method that used neighbourhood-based improved contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization (NICLAHE) to improve retinal image contrast was suggested to aid in the accurate identification of retinal disorders and improve the visibility of fine retinal structures. Additionally, a minimal-order filter was applied to effectively denoise the images without compromising important retinal structures. The novel NICLAHE algorithm was inspired by the classical CLAHE algorithm, but enhanced it by selecting the clip limits and tile sized in a dynamical manner relative to the pixel values in an image as opposed to using fixed values. It was evaluated on the Drive and high-resolution fundus (HRF) datasets on conventional quality measures.
resultsThe new proposed preprocessing technique was applied to two retinal image databases, Drive and HRF, with four quality metrics being, root mean square error (RMSE), peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR), root mean square contrast (RMSC), and overall contrast. The technique performed superiorly on both the data sets as compared to the traditional enhancement methods. In order to assess the compatibility of the method with automated diagnosis, a deep learning framework named ResNet was applied in the segmentation of retinal blood vessels. Sensitivity, specificity, precision and accuracy were used to analyse the performance. NICLAHE-enhanced images outperformed the traditional techniques on both the datasets with improved accuracy.
conclusionNICLAHE provides better results than traditional methods with less error and improved contrast-related values. These enhanced images are subsequently measured by sensitivity, specificity, precision, and accuracy, which yield a better result in both datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.