ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Assessing the prevalence of developmental delays in children aged 6-36 months using Ages and Stages Questionnaire-3 in a rural area of North India.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim is to evaluate the prevalence and range of developmental delays and identify factors that contribute to these delays among children aged 6 months to 3 years living in a rural community in northern India. Design: Prospective cross-sectional study. Setting: The research was conducted in the Outpatient Department and immunization clinic of a tertiary care center located in northern India. Material and Methods: A total of 400 children aged 6 months to 3 years were enrolled. The Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) was translated into Hindi and administered to parents by a trained interviewer. Socio-demographic data of the families were collected. The prevalence of global developmental delay was estimated, and associations between developmental outcomes and maternal, child, and household characteristics were analyzed using the Chi-square test, with significance set at Results: Among the 400 children, 80 (20%) exhibited global developmental delays (below the cutoff), while the remaining 320 (80%) were either normal or near the cutoff. The domains most affected in the study population were personal-social (43.5%) and fine motor (40.5%), followed by gross motor (38.6%), problem-solving (35.8%), and communication (34.8%). Various socio-demographic factors were found to influence child development. Conclusion: There is a high prevalence of developmental delays and poor child health in our rural population. Early intervention programs could mitigate the long-term impacts of these developmental disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.