ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Barriers and motivators experienced by South Asian primary care physicians in conducting research.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Research in primary healthcare is vital for improving clinical practices, health outcomes, and policy effectiveness. Despite recognizing its importance and willingness to conduct it many general practitioners face barriers in doing it. Objectives: Our study aimed to understand the challenges in conducting research and identify factors that motivate research culture among primary care physicians in South Asia. Methods: Descriptive cross-sectional study is conducted among practicing primary care physicians in several South Asian countries. The online survey forms were emailed and shared on professional social media platforms. Data analysis was done using SPSS software version 23.0. Descriptive analysis such as frequency and percentages were calculated. For categorical data chai square was applied. Results: Out of the 155 participants, 62% had participated in research training sessions. However, less than one-fifth of the participants had published research articles at least once in the past two years. The main obstacles were lack of mentorship (72%), insufficient training (66%), lack of technical or statistical support (65%), and financial constraints (59%). The primary motivators were to update knowledge (63%) and to improve the quality of care (61%). We did observe a significant negative correlation (p=0.02) between the number of years in practice and the motivation to conduct research. Conclusion: Most primary care physicians recognize the value of research. However, obstacles such as a lack of mentorship, formal training, and financial support hinder their research efforts. The motivating factors we identified could be used to inspire more primary care physicians to engage in research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.