ArticleHeart rhythm O22025
Effectiveness of cardiac device envelopes in preventing infections among pacemaker patients: The REINFORCE Brady real-world project.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Infections related to cardiac implantable electrical devices are among the most challenging and costly complications. Although the absorbable antibiotic-eluting envelope has shown efficacy in reducing infection risk, data on its use in pacemaker (PM) and cardiac resynchronization therapy PM (CRT-P) devices are limited. Objectives: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the TYRX envelope in preventing systemic and pocket infections in patients undergoing PM or CRT-P implantation or revision. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter analysis included 896 patients undergoing PM or CRT-P implantation or revision between August 2020 and April 2024. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: the envelope group (n = 350), receiving the TYRX envelope, and the control group (n = 546). Results: Over a mean follow-up of 2.2 ± 2.1 years, systemic or pocket infections occurred in 1.2% of patients, with significantly fewer infections in the envelope group (0.3%) than the control group (1.8%) ( Conclusions: In patients with PMs and CRT-Ps, the use of the TYRX envelope is associated with significantly lower occurrence of device-related infections. This benefit was sustained over long-term follow-up, supporting its effectiveness in routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.