Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41280531›Full record

ArticleHeart rhythm O22025

Enhancing explainability in clinical deep-learning models: Latent-space variable decoding is superior to gradient-weighted class activation mapping.

Richard T Carrick, Ethan J Rowin, Alessio Gasperetti, Christopher Madias, Martin Maron, Katherine C Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Richard T CarrickJohns Hopkins Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Balitmore, Maryland.
Ethan J RowinLahey Hospital and Medical Center Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts.
Alessio GasperettiJohns Hopkins Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Balitmore, Maryland.
Christopher MadiasTufts Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Martin MaronLahey Hospital and Medical Center Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts.
Katherine C WuJohns Hopkins Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Balitmore, Maryland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Deep-learning models designed to assist with clinical decision making abound in cardiology. However, the "black box" nature of these models limits physicians' ability to use them to cross-check clinical gestalt when evaluating model predictions. Analytical techniques such as the popular gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) may provide insight into model explainability, but the reliability and reproducibility of these techniques have not been studied. Objective: To perform a rigorous assessment of the explainability offered by Grad-CAM, with comparison to alternative saliency methods provided by intrinsicly explainable deep-learning models. Methods: We examined a well-phenotyped cohort of 1930 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and available electrocardiographic waveform data. Novel deep-learning models were developed for the prediction of 2 high-risk HCM features: left ventricular (LV) apical aneurysm and massive LV hypertrophy. Saliency analysis was performed using (1) Grad-CAM and (2) latent-space variable decoding (LSVD). Results: Deep-learning models amenable to Grad-CAM- and LSVD-based saliency analysis demonstrated comparable performances in the identification of LV apical aneurysm (C statistic 0.95 vs 0.93) and massive LV hypertrophy (C statistic 0.82 vs 0.83) during holdout testing. However, while Grad-CAM produced highly variable visual assessments of model attention and offered little insight into the models' underlying decision-making processes, LSVD allowed direct visualization of those electrocardiographic characteristics that differentiated patients with and without the high-risk HCM features of interest. In addition, Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fit testing of latent-space variables offered a method for prospectively assessing the likelihood of deep-learning model overfitting. Conclusion: Deep-learning models amenable to LSVD analysis offered more robust explainability than did models amenable to the popular Grad-CAM analytical technique while offering comparable predictive performance.

Indexed as

Deep-learningExplainabilityGradient-weighted class activation mappingHypertrophic cardiomyopathyLatent-space variable decodingSaliency analysisVariational autoencoder

Identifiers

PMID41280531
PMCPMC12635720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.