ArticleArthroplasty today2025
Evaluating Research Productivity Trends Among Orthopaedic Adult Reconstruction Fellowship Applicants: A Bibliometric Study.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The research benchmarks necessary for a successful adult reconstruction fellowship match remain unclear. This study aimed to characterize and identify trends in the academic profiles of adult reconstruction fellows in the United States. Methods: The American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons fellowship directory was used to identify U.S. adult reconstruction fellowships programs that listed fellows graduating from 2019 to 2023. For each fellow, total number of publications, authorship position, number of publications with an adult reconstruction focus, and number of citations were collected using Scopus. Only publications accepted or published before the fellow's match year were compiled. Research productivity was compared across medical degree, sex, fellowship year, and residency program geographic region. Results: A total of 247 fellows from 46 programs were identified. Fellows published an average of 5.5 ± 9.7 publications during residency, with 66.6 ± 190.4 citations. There was no significant change in research productivity from 2019 to 2023. Average number of publications per fellow was significantly greater for fellows with an MD degree compared with a DO degree (5.8 ± 10.0 vs 2.1 ± 4.2; Conclusions: There was no change in research output among adult reconstruction fellows graduating from 2019 to 2023, suggesting that research may not be driving the increased competitiveness of adult reconstruction fellowships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.