ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Low-dose intravenous esketamine on a depressive catatonia patient with venous thromboembolism: a case report.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Catatonia is a rare but potentially life-threatening psycho-motor syndrome. It is mainly manifested as decreased activities, or excessive and specific activities, such as stupor, agitation and defiance. Catatonia can appear in various diseases and the diagnosis and treatment of depressive catatonia are often delayed. As an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, esketamine shows antidepressant and anti-catatonic effects by regulating glutamatergic signal transduction and enhancing synaptic plasticity. Methods: The present case involved a 55-year-old woman with depressive catatonia. Benzodiazepines, aripiprazole and nutritional support were given after admission. As she had a poor response to the initial treatment, we considered using the modified electroconvulsive therapy (MECT). Due to the deep vein thrombosis in the lower extremities, the application of MECT was restricted. With the consent of her and family, we decied to administrate a sub-anesthetic dose of intravenous (IV) Esketamine (0.2 mg/Kg) combined with 50mg desvenlafaxine. During the process, we assessed the effect by comparing depression severity scores using validated psychiatric scales before and after the treatment. Adverse drug reactions were evaluated by adverse drug reaction scale. Result: The symptoms of catatonia were relieved in 4 hours after esketamine administration. The Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS) decreased from 19 to 0. 48 hours after injection, the depressive symptoms were relieved and the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) decreased from 46 to 9. The condition remained stable on 20 weeks of follow-up. Conclusions: As a safe and rapid intervention, Esketamine might be a new option for catatonic patients who cannot undergo MECT or fail to respond to conventional treatment. It may be worthy of further research in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.