ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Machine learning on a smartphone-based CPT for ADHD prediction.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Continuous Performance Tests (CPTs) are widely utilized as objective measures in the assessment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). The integration of sensor data in smartphones has become increasingly common as a way of monitoring several behavioural indicators of mental health. Machine learning has started being utilized in the field of ADHD to improve diagnosis. This investigation explores (i) the feasibility of using smartphone devices to administer a CPT for ADHD assessment and (ii) whether data from built-in sensors in smartphone devices is useful for predicting a diagnosis. Methodology: The study uses data from a control group of neurotypical individuals and an ADHD cohort of unmedicated patients. The dataset is divided into a training and test set, and a machine learning model is developed using the training set. The model is trained by dividing features into four groups, Demographic, CPT, Face, and Motion, which are then sequentially added and evaluated on their ability to predict ADHD. Results: A total of 952 neurotypical individuals and 292 unmedicated ADHD patients were part of the study. The best performing model combines all feature groups by a sensitivity of 0.808, specificity of blue and area under the precision-recall curve (PR-AUC) of 0.799, with a considerable performance increase due to the phone sensor features addition. Results did not differ significantly by age group (6-11 and 12-60 years old) and sex. Conclusion: The study provides a robust machine-learning model that is based on a large control group together with an ADHD cohort. The experiments demonstrated that ADHD can be assessed with high accuracy using CPTs on smartphones. Integrating face-tracking and motion sensor data with CPT features further enhanced performance, indicating that data from a smartphone device can surpass the accuracy of traditional computer-based ADHD assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.