ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2025
The FOUND questionnaire: identifying stable traits associated with success in remote operations-an exploratory study.
Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study introduces the FOUndatioNal trait-BaseD Characterization (FOUND) questionnaire, specifically developed to assess stable characteristics of perceptual, cognitive, and emotional domains associated with effective performance in mediated settings. Materials and methods: Items were derived from interviews with professionals in remote technology fields (e.g., robotic surgeons, drone pilots, crane operators) and grouped into four domains: cognitive-behavioral, socio-emotional, functional-organic, and value-based. Items, rated on a 4-point Likert scale, were designed to reflect stable traits. A panel of nine experts evaluated content validity; items with a CVI > 0.78 and a mean relevance ≥3 were retained, resulting in a 26-item scale. The factorial structure of FOUND was validated in a sample of 300 Italian participants, with convergent validity assessed, and participants were subsequently categorized into high and low procedural skill professions for known-groups comparisons (Study 1). Additionally, a separate sample of 34 remote operators (Study 2) was included to further evaluate known-groups validity. Results: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses yielded a final 22-item structure, identifying four factors: Perception and Action, Empathic Attitude, Stress Management, and Group-Oriented Values. Convergent validity analysis using questionnaires that assess personality and stable characteristics (Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire-15, Big Five Inventory-10) did not yield significant correlations, indicating that the FOUND questionnaire may provide independent information. Known-groups validity was assessed by comparing scores between professions requiring high and low procedural skills identified in the 300 participants, revealing higher scores in Perception and Action, Empathic Attitude, and Stress Management for the first group (Study 1). Comparing remote operators (i.e., drone pilots) with the general population showed that remote operators scored higher in Perception and Action and Group-Oriented Values but lower in Stress Management, highlighting distinctive characteristics of individuals engaged in remote operations (Study 2). Conclusion: The FOUND assesses perceptual, motor, cognitive, and socio-emotional constructs associated with performance in mediated and remote operations. It allows evaluation of stable traits and performance-related attitudes in contexts such as robotic surgery, telemedicine, education, and emergency response. By identifying these traits, the questionnaire can inform the design of personalized interventions and training programs tailored to individual characteristics, enhancing effectiveness in mediated environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.