Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41280424›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Laxity index measurement on stress radiographs obtained using the Vezzoni-modified Badertscher distension device technique: repeatability and reproducibility in a large cohort of dogs.

Sara Sassaroli, Francesco Gallorini, Francesco Roggiolani, Alberto Salvaggio, Rosario Vallefuoco, Andrea Pratesi, Mario Fordellone, Elisa Campagnoli, Angela Palumbo Piccionello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sara SassaroliSchool of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy.
Francesco GalloriniClinica Veterinaria San Silvestro, Castiglion Fiorentino, Italy.
Francesco RoggiolaniTechnevet, Matelica, Italy.
Alberto SalvaggioTechnevet, Matelica, Italy.
Rosario VallefuocoDepartment of Small Animal Surgery, Pride Veterinary Referrals, Derby, United Kingdom.
Andrea PratesiPrivate Practitioner, Padova, Italy.
Mario FordelloneUnit of Medical Statistics, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania, Napoli, Italy.
Elisa CampagnoliSchool of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy.
Angela Palumbo PiccionelloSchool of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The Vezzoni-modified Badertscher distension device (VMBDD) technique is a radiographic method used to assess hip joint laxity, and it is widely used across Europe. While the intra-observer and inter-observer variability of the laxity index (LI) measured on stress radiographs obtained using the VMBDD technique has been reported, it has never been evaluated in a large cohort of patients. The study aims to assess the repeatability and reproducibility of the LI measured on stress radiographs obtained using the VMBDD technique in a large cohort of dogs. Methods: Stress radiographs obtained using the VMBDD method were analyzed for medium to large breed dogs, aged between 4.5 and 6 months and presented between 2021 and 2024 for screening of hip dysplasia. The LI for each hip was blindly measured by three observers with different levels of experience. Significant intra- and inter-observer variability was evaluated to assess the repeatability and reproducibility of the LI, respectively. Statistical testing was performed, and a Results: A total of 195 stress radiographs (390 hip joints) were included. The inter-observer ICC showed moderate agreement (ICC = 0.55, 95% CI 0.50-0.59). Estimated marginal means (EMMeans) indicated that Observer 3 consistently provided higher LI values compared to Observers 1 and 2 across all time points (e.g., at T1: 0.484 vs. 0.410 and 0.438, Conclusion: In-house evaluation of the LI on stress radiographs obtained using the VMBDD technique showed that it was a highly repeatable procedure but a moderate reproducible measurement due to a systematic upward bias by an observer with less experience. Nevertheless, the mean differences could be considered negligible in a clinical setting due to their low impact on the definitive diagnosis.

Indexed as

canine hip dysplasialaxity indexrepeatabilityreproducibilitystress radiograph

Identifiers

PMID41280424
PMCPMC12634319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.