SynthesisFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Impacts of exoprosthesis use in dogs with partial amputation and limb malformations: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Customized 3D orthopedic exoprostheses for dogs with amputations and congenital malformations: a case series study.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- 3D printed eyeball implants in dogs with advanced glaucoma: a case series study.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Congenital malformations and limb amputations are common causes of locomotor impairment in dogs, affecting their mobility and well-being. Exoprostheses reemerge as a promising alternative for restoring locomotor function and improving animal welfare. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of the impacts of exoprostheses used in dogs with limb amputations or malformations. Methods: The research followed PRISMA guidelines, with searches conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and SciELO databases, using terms related to dogs, prosthetics, 3D printing, and locomotion. Original articles with clinical applications of socket-type exoprostheses in dogs, made by 3D printing or similar materials, were included. Studies without direct clinical data, implantable prostheses, and assistive devices were excluded. The selection was made independently by two reviewers, and the snowballing strategy broadened the analysis. Results: After screening and analysis, ten articles were included for synthesis. Among these studies, the main causes of amputation were trauma, congenital deformities, and neoplasms, affecting both thoracic and pelvic limbs. Regarding the exoprosthesis manufacturing approach, most studies used the traditional method of vacuum forming a thermoplastic over a positive form, and three describe the use of 3D printing as an alternative to producing animal prostheses. The studies reported significant improvements in dogs' mobility and quality of life, although complications such as skin lesions and difficulties with fixation were reported, necessitating adjustments and ongoing veterinary supervision. Discussion: Customized exoprostheses offer effective and affordable solutions for dogs with amputations, promoting functional improvements and well-being. Further research is warranted to enhance durability and establish standardized protocols for clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.