Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41280363›Full record

ArticleToxicology reports2025

Less is more: Evaluating the effectiveness of simplified two and three-element scores for predicting unfavorable outcomes in acute toxic alcohol exposure: A multi-center study.

Asmaa Fady Sharif, Badar Abdullah Al Qasem, Muhannad Abdullah Alsaidan, Abdulaziz Adel Al Abdulkader, Sultan Abdulhamid Albisher, Mesfer Mubarak Hanif, Bandar Saleh Aldurayb, Mohammad Abdullah Al-Otaibi, Abeer Jaber Mohamed, Fahad Aldosari and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Asmaa Fady SharifDepartment of Clinical Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Dar Al-Uloom University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Badar Abdullah Al QasemMedical Student, College of Medicine, Dar Al-Uloom University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Muhannad Abdullah AlsaidanMedical Student, College of Medicine, Dar Al-Uloom University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulaziz Adel Al AbdulkaderMedical Student, College of Medicine, Dar Al-Uloom University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sultan Abdulhamid AlbisherMedical Student, College of Medicine, Dar Al-Uloom University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mesfer Mubarak HanifMedical Student, College of Medicine, Dar Al-Uloom University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Bandar Saleh AlduraybMedical Student, College of Medicine, Dar Al-Uloom University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad Abdullah Al-OtaibiMedical Student, College of Medicine, Dar Al-Uloom University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abeer Jaber MohamedPoison Control Department, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh 12231, Saudi Arabia.
Fahad AldosariClinical Pharmacy Department, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid A Al-MulhimEmergency Medicine Department, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh 12231, Saudi Arabia.
Zahraa Khalifa SobhForensic Medicine and Clinical Toxicology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toxic alcohols are readily available in multiple household products. Although acute toxic alcohol exposure is less frequently reported, it results in severe consequences. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the three elements score, PGI]pH, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), and Impaired systolic blood pressure (SBP)] score and its two elements modified PG (pH and GCS) score, in identifying high-risk alcohol-exposed patients, compared to the multivariable conventional poison severity score (PSS). This cross-sectional study was conducted among 80 patients admitted to two poison control centers over a five-year period. These patients were exposed to toxic alcohols, including methanol, glycols, and propanol. The PGI/PG scores were derived retrospectively by assigning one point for every adopted variable, including pH < 7.25, GCS < 13, and impaired SBP < 90 mmHg. Patients with unfavorable outcomes constituted 27.5 %, where 17.5 % underwent hemodialysis (HD), 6.3 % developed blindness, 5 % needed mechanical ventilation (MV), and 2.5 % died. Patients with unfavorable outcomes demonstrated significantly higher PSS, PGI, and PG scores (p < 0.05). PSS was superior in predicting blindness only. PGI and PG scores demonstrated higher capabilities for predicting unfavorable outcomes, as well as the need for HD and MV. PG achieved the highest areas under curve as an unfavorable outcome's predictor (0.889), need for HD (0.819), and MV (0.993). The PGI and PG scores could serve as simple and reliable predictors of unfavorable outcomes, including the need for HD and MV among patients poisoned with acute toxic alcohol exposure.

Indexed as

BlindnessHemodialysisMechanical ventilationMethanolPGI scoreToxic alcohol poisoning

Identifiers

PMID41280363
PMCPMC12634277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.