Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41280360›Full record

ArticleNature machine intelligence2025

Deep generative classification of blood cell morphology.

Simon Deltadahl, Julian Gilbey, Christine Van Laer, Nancy Boeckx, Mathie P G Leers, Tanya Freeman, Laura Aiken, Timothy Farren, Matthew Smith, Mohamad Zeina and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature machine intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Simon DeltadahlDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0009-0009-8437-7705
Julian GilbeyDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5987-5261
Christine Van LaerDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Nancy BoeckxDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Mathie P G LeersDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5186-5600
Tanya FreemanDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Laura AikenDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Timothy FarrenDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Matthew SmithDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Mohamad ZeinaHigh Dimensional Neurology Group, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8119-1931
Stephen MacDonaldCambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Daniel GleghornCambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK.
BloodCounts! consortium
James Hf RuddDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2243-3117
Concetta PiazzeseBarts Life Sciences, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3605-1809
Joseph TaylorDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Nicholas GleadallNational Health Service Blood and Transplant, Cambridge, UK.
Carola-Bibiane SchönliebDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Suthesh Sivapalaratnam *Department of Clinical Haematology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Michael Roberts *Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3484-5031
Parashkev Nachev *High Dimensional Neurology Group, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2718-4423

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood cell morphology assessment via light microscopy constitutes a cornerstone of haematological diagnostics, providing crucial insights into diverse pathological conditions. This complex task demands expert interpretation owing to subtle morphological variations, biological heterogeneity and technical imaging factors that obstruct automated approaches. Conventional machine learning methods using discriminative models struggle with domain shifts, intraclass variability and rare morphological variants, constraining their clinical utility. We introduce CytoDiffusion, a diffusion-based generative classifier that faithfully models the distribution of blood cell morphology, combining accurate classification with robust anomaly detection, resistance to distributional shifts, interpretability, data efficiency and uncertainty quantification that surpasses clinical experts. Our approach outperforms state-of-the-art discriminative models in anomaly detection (area under the curve, 0.990 versus 0.916), resistance to domain shifts (0.854 versus 0.738 accuracy) and performance in low-data regimes (0.962 versus 0.924 balanced accuracy). In particular, CytoDiffusion generates synthetic blood cell images that expert haematologists cannot distinguish from real ones (accuracy, 0.523; 95% confidence interval: [0.505, 0.542]), demonstrating good command of the underlying distribution. Furthermore, we enhance model explainability through directly interpretable counterfactual heat maps. Our comprehensive evaluation framework establishes a multidimensional benchmark for medical image analysis in haematology, ultimately enabling improved diagnostic accuracy in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Biomedical engineeringComputational models

Identifiers

PMID41280360
PMCPMC12629977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.