ArticleIJID regions2025
Bacterial agent, antibiotic resistance profile and predictors of urinary tract infection among pregnant women attending antenatal care in Ethiopia.
Article in IJID regions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common globally, impacting quality of life and creating financial and medical difficulties. They are a concern in both community and hospital settings. The purpose of the study was to assess the bacteriological profile, risk factors, and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of UTIs in pregnant women attending antenatal care in East Wallaga, Ethiopia. Methods: Institutional-based cross-sectional research was carried out among pregnant women. The Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion technique was used to identify bacterial profiles and evaluate them for antibiotic sensitivity. A 95% confidence interval was used, and a Results: In this study, the total prevalence of UTIs was 14.9% (95% confidence interval: 11.0-18.8%) (n = 44/296). Most of the isolated organisms were gram-negative (61.4%). Conclusions: In pregnant women, bacterial isolates from the current investigation indicated an alarming level of antibiotic resistance. Therefore, it's critical to identify the drug-susceptibility pattern of the causative agents of UTIs and diagnose them early and routinely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.