ArticlePNAS nexus2025
A novel method for evaluating and visualizing scratch wound healing assays using level-set and image sector analysis.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A deterministic method for quantifying spindle-shaped cells in noisy bright-field microscopy.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Nanosponge-integrated hydrogel ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- WoundPy: an improved automatized method for in vitro cell motility investigation based on wound alignment and absolute velocity profiling.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scratch wound healing assays are widely used to study collective cell migration, essential for understanding tissue regeneration, drug effects, and wound healing mechanisms. However, conventional analyses often rely on wound edge dynamics or individual cell tracks, limiting spatial insight into migration behavior. We present a sector-based analytical framework that reinterprets time-lapse microscopy data by dividing each image into defined spatial regions across the field of view. This enables spatially resolved characterization of how cell populations migrate over time. To address challenges of low contrast and uneven illumination in bright-field microscopy, we apply a level-set segmentation algorithm that robustly detects the wound edge. Using this approach, we show that both cell velocity and trajectory vary with distance from the wound boundary. We introduce a novel metric, the sector-boundary distance, to identify regions where cells migrate faster along nonradial paths. To assess chemotactic activation, cells were treated with the chemokine CXCL10 to stimulate motility via CXCR3-mediated signaling. Statistical testing showed that, in treated cells, the proportion of highly motile cells was significantly associated with wound closure, even in regions distant from the scratch, whereas directionality played a limited role. By contrast, untreated cells exhibited weaker and less organized migration patterns. These findings highlight how local cellular activity contributes to healing in a treatment-dependent manner. Our method bridges global wound-level analysis and local cell-scale behavior by combining single-cell tracking with precise boundary detection. The complete framework is available as open-source software, including a user-friendly web application that enables interactive analysis of microscopy data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.