Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41280299›Full record

ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2025

Comparison of In-Hospital and At-Home Administration of Bowel Preparation Agents Before Outpatient Colonoscopy in Elderly Patients.

Daisuke Yamaguchi, Kasumi Gondo, Tadahiro Nomura, Yumi Mizuta, Shota Fukami, Satoshi Ishida, Shunichiro Kimura, Shun Fujimoto, Yuichiro Tanaka, Naoyuki Hino and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Daisuke YamaguchiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Saga University Saga Saga Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9782-9998
Kasumi GondoDepartment of Gastroenterology Ureshino Medical Center Ureshino Saga Japan.
Tadahiro NomuraDepartment of Gastroenterology Ureshino Medical Center Ureshino Saga Japan.
Yumi MizutaDepartment of Gastroenterology Ureshino Medical Center Ureshino Saga Japan.
Shota FukamiDepartment of Gastroenterology Ureshino Medical Center Ureshino Saga Japan.
Satoshi IshidaDepartment of Gastroenterology Ureshino Medical Center Ureshino Saga Japan.
Shunichiro KimuraDepartment of Gastroenterology Ureshino Medical Center Ureshino Saga Japan.
Shun FujimotoDepartment of Gastroenterology Ureshino Medical Center Ureshino Saga Japan.
Yuichiro TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterology Ureshino Medical Center Ureshino Saga Japan.
Naoyuki HinoDepartment of Gastroenterology Ureshino Medical Center Ureshino Saga Japan.
Keisuke ArioDepartment of Gastroenterology Ureshino Medical Center Ureshino Saga Japan.
Seiji TsunadaDepartment of Gastroenterology Ureshino Medical Center Ureshino Saga Japan.
Yasuhisa SakataDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Saga University Saga Saga Japan.
Motohiro EsakiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Saga University Saga Saga Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Most patients take bowel preparation agents at home before undergoing outpatient colonoscopy. However, some elderly patients undergo bowel preparation at the hospital. This study compared the outcomes of in-hospital (Group A) versus at-home (Group B) bowel preparation in elderly patients to clarify the usefulness of in-hospital bowel preparation. Patients and Methods: From September 2022 to September 2023, 151 patients aged 70 years or older undergoing outpatient colonoscopy at Ureshino Medical Center were prospectively enrolled (51 in Group A and 100 in Group B). The primary endpoint was bowel preparation time. Secondary endpoints were the number of defecations, colonoscopy start time, and adverse events. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to account for baseline differences, and multivariate analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with bowel preparation time. Results: After PSM, 26 matched pairs were analyzed. Group A had a significantly shorter bowel preparation time (192.1 ± 80.5 vs. 271.1 ± 57.9 min, Conclusions: For elderly patients, in-hospital bowel preparation is beneficial because it significantly shortens preparation and colonoscopy start times and reduces defecations, while maintaining safety and satisfaction rates compared with at-home preparation.

Indexed as

adverse eventsbowel preparation agentbowel preparation timecolonoscopyoutpatients

Identifiers

PMID41280299
PMCPMC12630077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.