Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41280298›Full record

ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2025

Diagnostic Utility of Liver Biopsy in Persistent Unexplained Liver Enzyme Elevation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

S Jaawan, A Krämer, R Masri, A Neesse, V Ellenrieder, A Amanzada, P Ströbel, F Bremmer, G Petzold

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Diagnostic Utility of Liver Biopsy in Persistent Unexplained Liver Enzyme Elevation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

S JaawanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Endocrinology University Medical Center Goettingen Goettingen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9044-4937
A KrämerDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Endocrinology University Medical Center Goettingen Goettingen Germany.
R MasriDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Endocrinology University Medical Center Goettingen Goettingen Germany.
A NeesseDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Endocrinology University Medical Center Goettingen Goettingen Germany.
V EllenriederDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Endocrinology University Medical Center Goettingen Goettingen Germany.
A AmanzadaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Endocrinology University Medical Center Goettingen Goettingen Germany.
P StröbelInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Goettingen Goettingen Germany.
F BremmerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Goettingen Goettingen Germany.
G PetzoldDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Endocrinology University Medical Center Goettingen Goettingen Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Chronically elevated liver enzymes without a clear etiology remain a frequent diagnostic challenge. This study evaluated the diagnostic yield of liver biopsy in such cases and assessed if laboratory parameters predict histological clarification. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 71 patients with unexplained elevated liver enzymes who underwent percutaneous liver biopsy between 2015 and 2021 at a tertiary referral center in Germany. Clinical characteristics and lab values were compared between patients with clarified and unclarified diagnoses. ROC analysis was performed for ALT and AST. Histopathological characteristics and biopsy-related complications were recorded. Results: A definitive diagnosis was reached in 47.9% of cases. The most frequent findings were autoimmune hepatitis (35.3%), drug-induced liver injury (23.5%), and NAFLD (23.5%). ALT and AST levels were significantly higher in patients with clarified diagnoses (ALT: Conclusions: Liver biopsy clarified the etiology in nearly half of patients and revealed diagnoses not apparent through non-invasive work-up. While ALT and AST levels were associated with diagnostic yield, they lacked sufficient predictive value. Biopsy remains a valuable tool in selected patients with unexplained liver enzyme elevations.

Identifiers

PMID41280298
PMCPMC12640264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.