Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41280244›Full record

ArticleCritical care research and practice2025

Challenges in Clinical Decision-Making for Nurses in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU): A Qualitative Study.

Fateme Mohammadi, Maryam Bahmanyar, Parisa Sabetsarvestani, Mostafa Bijani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fateme MohammadiDepartment of Nursing, Chronic Diseases (Home Care) Research Center and Autism Spectrum Disorders Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3475-4033
Maryam BahmanyarDepartment of Pediatrics, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
Parisa SabetsarvestaniDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
Mostafa BijaniDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7990-662X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Clinical decision-making is one of the most difficult responsibilities of healthcare personnel in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Meanwhile, nurses in NICU are facing countless challenges to take care of these neonates due to complex clinical conditions, prematurity, low birth weight, and physiological instability of the neonates, making clinical decision-making difficult. Thus, it is essential to identify and investigate the challenges in clinical decision-making for nurses in NICU. The aim of the present study was to explore the challenges that nurses face in clinical decision-making in NICU in southern Iran. Methods: The present study is a qualitative study with the content analysis in Iran from February 2023 to January 2024. Twenty-one NICU nurses participated in this study. Data were collected from individual, in-depth, and semistructured interviews. The interview questions, according to the opinion of the research team, were designed around the research question: "What are the challenges in clinical decision-making for nurses in NICU?" In order to analyze the data, the researchers used the conventional content analysis method. Results: The means of the participants' ages and work experience were 36.52 ± 5.71 and 12.45 ± 5.83 years, respectively. Three main themes with nine subthemes were obtained in this study. The main themes were "inadequate clinical competence" (lack of knowledge about caring for neonates, lack of clinical skill and experience, and shortage of nurse practitioners in NICUs); "poor self-efficacy" (poor self-confidence, inefficient stress management, and lack of motivation); and "resistance to change" (physician-centeredness, lack of organizational support, and ambiguities about legal rights). Conclusion: The findings of the study revealed that lack of knowledge, poor clinical skills, and not having a master's degree in neonatal intensive care adversely affect nurses' self-confidence in providing care and making clinical decisions. Also, the common belief that physicians are superior to nurses in the organizational culture and lack of support for nurses undermines nurses' motivation for enhancing their competence and participating in clinical decision-making. Based on the findings, managers and policy makers, by providing a supportive environment, as well as improving the knowledge and clinical skills of nurses, can encourage them to participate in clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

clinical decision-makingcritical careneonatalnursesqualitative study

Identifiers

PMID41280244
PMCPMC12638141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.