Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41280190›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Core facets of divine forgiveness: a study across monotheistic religions.

Francesca Giorgia Paleari, Francesca Vittoria Danioni, Valentina Valtulini, Daniela Barni, Aslı Bugay Sökmez, Sara Eissa, Yaakov Greenwald, Ariel Knafo-Noam, Camillo Regalia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Francesca Giorgia PaleariDepartment of Human and Social Sciences, University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy.
Francesca Vittoria DanioniFamily Studies and Research University Centre, Catholic University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Valentina ValtuliniDepartment of Human and Social Sciences, University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy.
Daniela BarniDepartment of Human and Social Sciences, University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy.
Aslı Bugay SökmezDepartment of Psychology, Cyprus Aydın University, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Sara EissaDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Yaakov GreenwaldDepartment of Psychology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Ariel Knafo-NoamDepartment of Psychology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Camillo RegaliaFamily Studies and Research University Centre, Catholic University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Among the religious factors that significantly contribute to believers' well-being, research on the personal experience of divine forgiveness (DF) remains in its infancy. The aim of this study was to investigate similarities and differences in the conceptualization of DF, its conditional/unconditional nature, and the understanding of sin across the three main monotheistic religions. Methods: This was achieved by interviewing theologians ( Results: The theologians' and believers' perspectives revealed that while there are shared aspects across religions (e.g., God's mercy is greater than His justice), some differences are evident (e.g., the pathways to seek and achieve DF). Discussion: These findings make a significant contribution to the psychology of religion, shedding light on universal and culturally specific dimensions of this multidimensional phenomenon.

Indexed as

cross-religion comparisondivine forgivenessfocus groupmonotheistic religionsself-reportsin

Identifiers

PMID41280190
PMCPMC12631403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.