Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41280185›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2025

Inferential accuracy in classroom contexts.

Zachary J Schroeder, Jenefer Husman, Sara D Hodges

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zachary J SchroederDepartment of Psychology, College of Arts & Sciences, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States.
Jenefer HusmanDepartment of Education Studies, College of Education, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States.
Sara D HodgesDepartment of Psychology, College of Arts & Sciences, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper connects two research traditions-social psychology's examination of inferential accuracy, and educational research on teacher cognition and decision-making, in order to consider how teachers attempt to accurately infer their students' thoughts and feelings during instruction. Our aim is to link the social psychological study of inferential accuracy with several prominent educational constructs related to teacher expertise. We begin by introducing inferential accuracy and providing a brief overview of social psychology research about it. We suggest that inferential accuracy may affect teacher decisions in what are known as "discretionary spaces" in classroom settings. Next, we delineate similarities and differences between inferential accuracy and two constructs related to teacher expertise (diagnostic competence and teacher noticing). We then identify the parallels between inferential accuracy and two other educational constructs-pedagogical content knowledge and informal formative assessment. Throughout this synthesis, we consider applications of inferential accuracy research to inform how, and how well, teachers may be able to infer their students' thoughts and feelings during instruction, as well as the ways that social psychology researchers may consider teacher-student classroom interactions as fruitful settings in which to examine interpersonal accuracy. We point out the educational constructs that correspond to social psychological predictors of inferential accuracy, discuss areas of tension when translating inferential accuracy research into educational contexts, and suggest future research questions that may prove fruitful with interdisciplinary collaboration.

Indexed as

discretionary spacesempathic accuracyinferential accuracyinformal formative assessmentpedagogical content knowledge

Identifiers

PMID41280185
PMCPMC12634605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.