ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
We-perspective on vision impairment: pathways between common dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Common DC, how couples cope together with stress, may protect couples from relationship dissatisfaction in the context of vision impairment. However, the mechanisms through which common DC relate to couple satisfaction are underexplored. This study aimed to examine whether we-ness, intimacy, and perceiving vision impairment as a we-disease mediate the relationship between common dyadic coping (DC) and relationship satisfaction in the context of vision impairment. Methods: Ninety-nine individuals with visual impairment (IVI) and their spouses completed self-report questionnaires assessing DC, relationship satisfaction, intimacy, we-ness, and we-disease. An Actor-Partner Interdependence Mediation Model was performed. Results: Results showed that (1) higher levels of common DC were associated with higher intimacy and we-ness which, consequently, were associated with higher relationship satisfaction in both IVI and their spouses; and (2) the more IVI' spouses engage in common DC, the more IVI perceived we-disease and, consequently, the less their spouses were satisfied with the relationship. Discussion: Couples facing vision impairment benefited from conjoint coping efforts as they seem to strengthen their sense of togetherness and intimacy. The adaptiveness of dyadic appraisals for couples' adjustment should be further explored in view of unexpected results. Psychosocial rehabilitation sessions should include both partners and promote conjoint coping strategies to address challenges associated with vision impairment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.