ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Predicting teacher turnover in private universities: a machine learning approach based on 10 years of data and satisfaction factors.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Teacher turnover poses a significant challenge to the sustainable development of private universities in China. While machine learning (ML) has been increasingly applied to turnover prediction, existing studies often overlook psychological factors and lack longitudinal analysis. Methods: This study integrates a 10-year longitudinal dataset with satisfaction surveys from a private university in Western China. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was employed to extract key dimensions influencing turnover. Three ML models-K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Naive Bayes (NB), and Backpropagation Neural Network (BPNN)-were constructed and evaluated using accuracy, F1-score, and AUC. Results: The KNN model achieved the highest predictive performance (accuracy = 83.64%, F1 = 84.16%, AUC = 0.901). The "Compensation, Benefits, and Development" dimension was identified as the most influential factor, accounting for 25.41% of the variance. Conclusion: This study proposes an "EFA + ML" hybrid approach that enhances feature interpretability and prediction robustness, offering practical insights for human resource management in private higher education institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.