Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41280162›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Digital transformation in higher education: logical framework, practical dilemmas, and implementation approaches.

Juan Tang, Pin Huang, Shuangsheng Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Juan Tang *School of Marxism, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Pin Huang *School of Marxism, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Shuangsheng YanSchool of Marxism, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The digital age comes with new demands and challenges for talent cultivation within the higher education system. The digital transformation in higher education has emerged as a critical element in addressing these challenges. This paper aims to develop an integrated qualitative model that advocates how digital transformation as a propelling force could be applied by university faculty and students during teaching and learning progress within the higher education institutions. An analysis of literature was performed to have a grasp of conceptual basis of digital transformation in higher education. Qualitative, in-depth case studies from Harvard University, Tsinghua University, and the University of Melbourne were engaged in to explore the transformation framework for university faculty and students. The study: 1) Proposes a triple logical framework comprising value logic, technological logic, and practical logic; 2) Examines four practical dilemmas encountered in advancing digital transformation within higher education teaching and learning environments based on logical framework, including both psychological and objective challenge for university teachers and students; 3) Outlines six implementation approaches to digital transformation in higher education, addressing aspects such as teaching concepts, teaching models, teaching resources, teaching scenarios, and evaluation systems. Finally, an illustrative digital SECI-based multimodal teaching model is suggested.

Indexed as

digital transformationdigital transformation in educationdigital transformation in higher educationhigher educationtransformation models

Identifiers

PMID41280162
PMCPMC12631623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.