Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41280158›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2025

Refining Active Surveillance Eligibility in Intermediate-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: The Impact of Time to First Recurrence.

Marco Finati, Nicola Schiavone, Biagio Barone, Roberto Contieri, Antonio Fanelli, Francesco Cinelli, Anna Ricapito, Nicola d'Altilia, Ugo Giovanni Falagario, Richard Naspro and 8 more

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Marco FinatiDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Nicola SchiavoneDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Biagio BaroneDepartment of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Roberto ContieriDepartment of Urology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, IRCCS, Fondazione "G. Pascale", Napoli, Italy.
Antonio FanelliDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Francesco CinelliDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Anna RicapitoDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Nicola d'AltiliaDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Ugo Giovanni FalagarioDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Richard NasproUrology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Savio Domenico PandolfoDepartment of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Felice CrocettoDepartment of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Ciro ImbimboDepartment of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Carlo BettocchiDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Luigi CormioDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Giuseppe CarrieriDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Benjamin PradereDepartment of Urology UROSUD, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France.
Gian Maria BusettoDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The International Bladder Cancer Group (IBCG) scoring system has been proposed for identifying patients suitable for active surveillance (AS) within the intermediate-risk (IR) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) population. Given that early recurrence has been associated with higher progression rates, we aimed to assess whether better integration of recurrence-free survival (RFS) into the IBCG risk stratification may further improve AS eligibility criteria. We retrospectively identified 241 recurrent IR-NMIBC patients (during the period 2013-2022) who were eligible for AS at the time of the first transurethral resection of a bladder tumor. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analyses evaluated the impact of IBCG risk factors and recurrence timing in predicting high-grade (HG) progression-free survival (PFS), while discrimination was assessed using Harrell's concordance index (C-index). Patients who recurred within 6 mo had significantly worse PFS than those with recurrence at >12 mo from diagnosis (3-yr PFS: 42% vs 74%, Patient summary: In this study, we looked at patients with bladder cancer who might be monitored (active surveillance) without immediate treatment. We found that if the cancer comes back within 6 mo, there is a higher chance that it will become more aggressive.

Indexed as

Active surveillanceIntermediate riskInternational Bladder Cancer GroupNon–muscle-invasive bladder neoplasmsUrinary bladder neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID41280158
PMCPMC12639428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.