Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41280141›Full record

ReviewBiomedical engineering letters2025

Deep learning-assisted tools to understand the structural biology of the synapse.

Zoltán Gáspári, Zsófia E Kálmán, Anna Sánta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedical engineering letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zoltán GáspáriFaculty of Information Technology and Bionics, Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Práter u. 50/A, Budapest, 1083 Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-8692-740X
Zsófia E KálmánFaculty of Information Technology and Bionics, Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Práter u. 50/A, Budapest, 1083 Hungary.
Anna SántaFaculty of Information Technology and Bionics, Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Práter u. 50/A, Budapest, 1083 Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The function of our brain is the result of the balanced interplay between billions of neurons forming a network of enormous complexity. However, the neurons themselves are also immensely complex entities, with many specialized macromolecular structures orchestrating signal processing and propagation. The postsynaptic density is an elaborate network of interconnected proteins, a dynamic yet highly organized molecular assembly beneath the dendritic membrane, and plays a pivotal role in learning, memory formation, and the development of a number of cognitive disorders. In this review, we argue that with the recent blooming of AI-assisted computational tools in structural biology, we might be able to get closer to understanding the molecular-level mechanistic aspects of this machinery. Nevertheless, we have to use these methods with caution as they are not yet capable of solving all the questions that arise for such a complex macromolecular system. First, we focus on the unique features of the postsynaptic protein network, highlighting those that pose particular challenges for such a modeling task, and put these in the light of the currently available deep learning-based approaches. We highlight the aspects that need specific attention and the areas where future developments could facilitate the detailed description of neural function at the molecular level.

Indexed as

Multivalent proteinsPostsynaptic densityProtein complex modelingProtein structure prediction

Identifiers

PMID41280141
PMCPMC12638465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.