Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41280140›Full record

ReviewIBRO neuroscience reports2025

EEG entropy modulation as a biomarker of emotion regulation and resilience.

W Tanner Creel, Richard E Hartman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in IBRO neuroscience reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

W Tanner CreelDepartment of Psychology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, United States.
Richard E HartmanDepartment of Psychology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A fundamental challenge in clinical neuropsychology is the objective assessment of emotion regulation and resilience. Current reliance on self-report is hampered by bias, creating a critical need for brain-based biomarkers that can capture the dynamics of emotional functioning. This review advances EEG entropy modulation as a theoretically appealing and emerging candidate. Converging research indicates that neural complexity, quantified by entropy measures, reflects the flexible information processing that underpins adaptive self-regulation. We synthesize evidence demonstrating diminished neural complexity in emotional dysregulation and anxiety, while interventions like mindfulness may work by restoring it. Moving beyond static, resting-state analysis, we argue that the modulation of entropy during cognitive-emotional tasks provides a far more powerful and ecologically valid marker of regulatory capacity. This dynamic approach, enhanced by emerging methods for capturing EEG in real-world settings, captures the brain's flexible response to challenges. Future research will benefit from exploring task-based entropy modulation in key regulatory hubs like the prefrontal cortex. Integrating these data with machine and deep learning approaches is a critical frontier, poised to identify distinct 'entropy profiles' of dysregulation and predict therapeutic response with an objectivity current methods lack. This interdisciplinary agenda seeks to bridge the gap between subjective experience and objective physiology, transforming how we assess and improve mental health outcomes.

Indexed as

BiomarkersEEGEmotion regulationEntropyResilience

Identifiers

PMID41280140
PMCPMC12639470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.